Enhancement proposals for the 3.0 draft

The public comment period closed January 31, 2008. This forum is now locked (read only).

Enhancement proposals for the 3.0 draft

Postby s03145 » Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:52 am

Hi,

I read a few parts of the draft, here are some things that do not seem right to me (but maybe I am wrong) :

- On page 169 line 24 after examle A.10.1f it says "The example prints: 2 3." However I do not see that anything is printed in the example (at least if bar is an unknown function).

- Shouldn't the output of the example A.10.2.f on page 170 line 20 to 25 have only two colums, because "print *, klast, jlast" only prints two variables?

- There is a typo on page 323 line 17 "The omp_get_active_level runtime library routine has benn added": benn -> been


best regards,
Samuel
s03145
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:33 am

Re: Enhancement proposals for the 3.0 draft

Postby s03145 » Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:58 am

Hi,

ups, I misread. The explanation is before the example not after it. So please ignore my comments.

best regards,
Samuel
s03145
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:33 am

Re: Enhancement proposals for the 3.0 draft

Postby lfm » Wed Oct 24, 2007 9:54 am

Thank you for pointing out the typo, I will add it to the list for 3.0 fixes, and see if there is some way to make it more clear (perhaps with better formatting) that the examples follow the descriptions.

-- Larry
lfm
 
Posts: 135
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 4:58 pm
Location: OpenMP ARB


Return to Draft 3.0 Public Comment

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron