Discuss the OpenMP 3.0 API Specifications with the OpenMP Arch. Review Board. (Read Only)
On page 72 (about flush), lines 16 and 17 define syntactical restrictions on the placement of 'taskwait'. This looks like an exact copy of the text of the proper taskwait definition. May I assume that instead of 'taskwait', 'flush' is intended here?
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Fri Jun 05, 2009 5:43 am
I think it is a typo. The directive name should be "flush" under this context. I will put forward to the language committee for the correction.
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:39 pm
Return to OpenMP 3.0 API Specifications
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests