Now, we can safely assume that the left and right sons have been executed before we process the current node.
Recommend using "child" instead of "son", as the former is more likely to be encountered in a contemporary textbook.
OpenMP® Forum
Discussion on the OpenMP specification run by the OpenMP ARB. OpenMP and the OpenMP logo are registered trademarks of the OpenMP Architecture Review Board in the United States and other countries. All rights reserved.
tree term change suggestion
2 posts
• Page 1 of 1
tree term change suggestion
by nathanweeks » Sat Aug 15, 2009 1:06 pm
Minor terminology change suggestion for p. 179, lines 2-3 of the OpenMP 3.0 API spec:
Recommend using "child" instead of "son", as the former is more likely to be encountered in a contemporary textbook.
Recommend using "child" instead of "son", as the former is more likely to be encountered in a contemporary textbook.
- nathanweeks
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 6:19 am
- Location: Iowa State University
Re: tree term change suggestion
by hhj » Mon Aug 17, 2009 4:06 pm
Dear Nathan,
Thank you for your suggestion. We will make a note for the next revision of the specification.
-Henry Jin (for OpenMP ARB)
Thank you for your suggestion. We will make a note for the next revision of the specification.
-Henry Jin (for OpenMP ARB)
- hhj
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 11:59 am
2 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to OpenMP 3.0 API Specifications
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest