Discuss the OpenMP 3.0 API Specifications with the OpenMP Arch. Review Board
Minor suggestion: changing the name of the subroutine in example A.13.2f from "traverse" to "postorder_traverse"
would be consistent with example A.13.2c, and would differentiate it from the subroutine in example A.13.1f.
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 6:19 am
- Location: Iowa State University
Again, thank you for your suggestion. We will make a note for the next revision of the specification.
-Henry Jin (for OpenMP ARB)
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 11:59 am
Return to OpenMP 3.0 API Specifications
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest